Pcspecialist OptimusXI 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemPcspecialist OptimusXI 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GK7MRFR
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 15:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 169
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 530
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1099) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 49.1
43% 52.9 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 46.4
41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$103
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 31 47 54 80 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45% Average
Read 478
Write 35.9
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 52
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 16
58% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 33.6
DQ Mixed 59.8
56% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2933C19S2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 18.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptimusXI 17 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Pcspecialist OptimusXI 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback