Atcomputers PREMIO BINGO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAtcomputers PREMIO BINGO  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte F2A58M-DS2
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 12:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4020 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 66.5
43% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 67.1
9% 67.3 Pts
64-Core 69
4% 69 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 2.4
4% 4.13 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 69 116 73 52 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 193
Write 172
Mixed 183
SusWrite 85.7
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 15.8
66% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 42.3
55% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PREMIO BINGO Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Atcomputers PREMIO BINGO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback