Dell Latitude E7450

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E7450  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06HN6G
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200411
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 19.2
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 50.8
28% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 113
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.4
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M8VC 512GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 245 290 277 347 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 348
Write 341
Mixed 336
SusWrite 298
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 22.6
74% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 112
98% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 326
12% 326 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7450 Builds (Compare 2,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback