Asus Q87T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q87T  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 06:59
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 83
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 391
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 1814 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 34.9
28% 35.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 25
26% 33 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Indmem mSATA 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 236 247 213 209 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 457
Write 243
Mixed 192
SusWrite 231
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 11.4
76% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 65
86% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 72%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
663GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 232 59 43 46 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 447
Write 375
Mixed 288
SusWrite 124
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 14
58% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 29.4
43% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87T Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q87T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback