Asus Q87T

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus Q87T (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20170721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 166 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 379 42% 330 Pts	64-Core 379 23% 379 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 7.2 3% 4.5 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 34 Parallax 32.5 26% 32.9 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 33 Splatting 23 25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Indmem mSATA 256GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 249 238 197 241 244 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 459 Write 222 Mixed 196 SusWrite 237 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 12 80% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 66.5 85% 148 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 72%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 640GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 64 27 58 69 12 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 449 Write 360 Mixed 273 SusWrite 50.4 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 14.4 61% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 89.9 DQ Mixed 1.6 29% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 18.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87T Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q87T

CPU
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	14x
Core i5-4690Intel $51Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	5x
Core i5-4690SIntel $141Bench 73%, 2,142 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x

SSD
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	6x
mSATA 256GBIndmemBench 64%, 88 samples	4x
M500 mSATA 120GBCrucial $398Bench 59%, 916 samples	4x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 1,183 samples	14x
Mac SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 309 samples	5x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16