Medion Erazer X7851 MD60698

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMedion Erazer X7851 MD60698  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670HP6GM
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 17:38
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 177
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 531
50% 414 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 63.3
50% 65.4 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 64.3
53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 227 248 249 250 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 418
Write 244
Mixed 210
SusWrite 241
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 20.6
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 183
169% 263 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
169GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 112 112 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61% Good
Read 463
Write 175
Mixed 290
SusWrite 113
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 25.8
77% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 179
152% 228 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 83%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
339GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 345 406 409 415 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 446
Write 401
Mixed 396
SusWrite 379
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 33.1
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 287
214% 287 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 63 82 86 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 70
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 73.1
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.3
323% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 112 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 122
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 110
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7851 MD60698 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Medion Erazer X7851 MD60698

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback