Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 270
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 19.6
11% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 12.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP210715
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 66 65 149 54 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 188
Write 229
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 81.3
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 0.2
33% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 90%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
109GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 91 90 89 85 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41% Average
Read 136
Write 109
Mixed 124
SusWrite 90.8
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 20.9
79% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 112
89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%
NET1000SSD1 1TB
787GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 350 372 381 400 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 360
Write 379
Mixed 340
SusWrite 379
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 25.1
95% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 174
140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
365GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 69 74 69 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 54.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 67.8
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
HGST HTS 541075A9E680 750GB
341GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 4 3.6 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 28.3
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 3.7
33% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 14%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
130GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 51.8
Write 29.6
Mixed 29
SusWrite 27.3
43% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2666U1908JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $417
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback