Hyrican GA-Q77M-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHyrican GA-Q77M-D2H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Q77M-D2H
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 406
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 49.8
43% 51.9 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 44
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ3A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 417 426 445 454 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 380
Write 430
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 411
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 0.7
45% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 17.7
15% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
432GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 121 118 120 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 120
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q77M-D2H Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Hyrican GA-Q77M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback