Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Notebook P65_67HSHP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_67HSHP
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170930
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '23 at 14:03
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 149 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 487 52% 411 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 65A3) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Lighting 98.7 Reflection 125 Parallax 96.9 80% 107 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 96 Splatting 104 80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 82%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,428 Write 1,278 Mixed 488 235% 1,065 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 36.2 133% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 727 DQ Write 499 DQ Mixed 579 442% 602 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 282GB free Firmware: M0CR050 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 347 Write 412 Mixed 340 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 29 97% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 322 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 711GB free Firmware: SDM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 72.4 Write 63.4 Mixed 60.4 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.3% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 24 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	191x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	171x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	40x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
Blue SATA M.2 250GBWD $89Bench 81%, 7,519 samples	8x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	28x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	8x
CM4X8GF2400C16S4 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 789 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 152% - Outstanding

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16