TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Xfusion 5288 V6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXfusion 5288 V6  (all builds)
MotherboardXFUSION BC13MBSBC
Memory1007.9 GB free of 1024 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1872 x 1004 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 06:05
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 160
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 632
55% 471 Pts
64-Core 3,779
234% 3,779 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 61.7%
 Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago XF-SAS3508 239GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.19
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,624
Write 3,863
Mixed 3146
723% 3,211 MB/s
4K Read 108
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 110
363% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 407
313% 425 MB/s
Avago XF-SAS3508 144TB
134TB free
Firmware: 5.19
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,492
Write 3,448
Mixed 3,178
754% 3,373 MB/s
4K Read 108
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 109
360% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 467
353% 471 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 32 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
272% Outstanding
MC Read 101
MC Write 139
MC Mixed 111
334% 117 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 272%
 Great: 283%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback