Lenovo 82K2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82K2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211118
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 02:52
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 770
78% 632 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 49.6
48% 62.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 57.2
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,824
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,216
340% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 52.6
178% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 413
334% 467 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE LD4AS008G-H3200GST 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82K2 Builds (Compare 4,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82K2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback