Sony VPCF24P1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony VPCF24P1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 22:11
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 138
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 324
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Sony(104D 9089) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 1.5
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 640GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JFDOA130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 28 30 41 49 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 48.1
Write 62
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 42.5
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF24P1E Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF24P1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback