Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 05:30
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 86.1
45% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 161
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 58 55 60 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 58.4
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
55GB free
Firmware: 00.0NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 56 60 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 78.9
Mixed 47
SusWrite 59.1
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
273GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 62 65 67 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 63.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 64.8
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 BL25664TB1608.16FF 6GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback