HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory10 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220711
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 263
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 822
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 84.1
74% 88.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 71.9
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
151GB free
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,446
Write 930
Mixed 992
248% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.5
185% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 326
272% 397 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
264GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 36.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 36.3
8% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 13.2
43% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 23.3
18% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 160
Mixed 73
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD easystore 2625 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 302
Write 18.2
Mixed 97
128% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.2
146% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8ME-8XR KHX3200C16D4/16GX 24GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 25.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback