Medion DEFENDER P10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion DEFENDER P10  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NH77Dx
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 19:47
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 234
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 572
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1181
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 108
Parallax 104
91% 108 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 87.1
Splatting 77.7
77% 96.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12S-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27B-09 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 514 542 551 562 559 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 1,596
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 629
257% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 53.6
172% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 790
554% 697 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 165%
Great: 197%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
931GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 352 394 415 449 447 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 409
Write 428
Mixed 361
SusWrite 390
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 27.6
90% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 279
227% 323 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 121%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
22GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 57 76 95 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 89.9
Write 102
Mixed 34
SusWrite 76.5
101% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 44%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 640GB
37GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 0.6
4% 2.77 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DEFENDER P10 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion DEFENDER P10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback