Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 17:55
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 333
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,228
113% 946 Pts
64-Core 2,274
141% 2,274 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 293
Parallax 318
230% 298 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 259
Splatting 195
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 200%
Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV1TB-D8 1TB
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0709E0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 68 288 120 69 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,302
Write 416
Mixed 725
SusWrite 206
146% 662 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 20.5
113% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 305
253% 379 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 116%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MRX4U360JNNM16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback