Asus X550VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VX
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 274
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1130) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 4.9
3% 7.37 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 300 151 119 132 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 420
Write 385
Mixed 340
SusWrite 196
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 26.3
82% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 115
142% 253 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550VX Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback