HP ENVY Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8155
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 05:08
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 176
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 504
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8155) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 16
Parallax 5.69
5% 9.2 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 11.9
7% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 383
Mixed 397
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 38
139% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 110
133% 235 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99%
Great: 134%
HP ENVY 7640 series 32GB
24GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.62% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 9.96
Mixed 12.4
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.22
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.68
63% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 12GB
1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Notebook Builds (Compare 1,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback