Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 550
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 38.2
24% 33.5 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 27
Splatting 22.4
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
85GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 288 293 308 279 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 397
Write 415
Mixed 323
SusWrite 296
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 32.8
114% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 255
209% 296 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 101%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
118GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 158 158 166 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 154
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 158
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 240GB
144GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 40.8
Write 41.4
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 39.3
56% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 13.7
1,030% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 15.1
1,298% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 79%
SanDisk SDSSDA240G 240GB
67GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 156 159 154 159 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 190
Mixed 191
SusWrite 159
252% 188 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 8.3
1,786% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 9
2,648% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 199%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback