TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory76GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 76GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory69.7 GB free of 76 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 106
40% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 315
30% 250 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Oracle BlockVolume 50GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 48 45 44 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 47.5
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.6
278% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 26.9%
 Great: 31%
Oracle BlockVolume 215GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 91 98 96 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 122
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 95
73% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 50.4%
 Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 76GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 12288 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
123% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 56.9
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 23.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 123%
 Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples4x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples7x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples5x
SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples3x
RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples23x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples12x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback