AMD 970A-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAMD 970A-D3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 03:30
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 107
53% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 170
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Dell(1028 0B0E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 76 75 77 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 82.9
Write 62.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 76.7
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
145GB free
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 72 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 65.9
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 70.6
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 42%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 500GB
443GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 185 203 215 216 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 200
196% 143 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 13.5
1,115% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 24.6
2,012% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 123%
Great: 166%
JMicron Generic 500GB
164GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 154 143 120 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 145
Mixed 131
SusWrite 124
189% 143 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 12
1,070% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 21.2
1,791% 24 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 110%
Great: 222%
Generic External 500GB
374GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 60 103 68 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 114
Write 135
Mixed 132
SusWrite 67.4
153% 112 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 12.1
1,063% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 19.4
1,738% 23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12.5
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-D3 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD 970A-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback