AMD 970A-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAMD 970A-D3  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 19:12
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 119
56% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Dell(1028 0B0E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.4
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 6.5
5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 73 82 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 83.9
Write 93.2
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 78.6
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
149GB free
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 67.8
Write 72.6
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 71.8
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%
JMicron Generic 500GB
172GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 144 143 130 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 110
Mixed 152
SusWrite 121
182% 138 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 18.7
1,491% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 33.3
DQ Mixed 22.5
1,982% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 126%
Great: 222%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 500GB
465GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 142 152 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 181
Mixed 167
SusWrite 146
236% 180 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 20.6
1,626% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 25.8
2,171% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 146%
Great: 166%
Generic External 500GB
374GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 98 104 107 116 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 128
Write 114
Mixed 126
SusWrite 111
162% 119 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 15.2
1,354% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,651% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 117%
Great: 79%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 240GB
223GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 140 150 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 173
Mixed 189
SusWrite 145
239% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 20.6
1,630% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 25.3
2,160% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 145%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-D3 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD 970A-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback