Lenovo 80FF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80FF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-80
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 143
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Legend(17AA 381C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.6
6% 8.37 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 369 400 443 438 365 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
734GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 61 60 55 76 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 83
Write 94.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 65.3
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80FF Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback