Lenovo 90NC00JJUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90NC00JJUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3717
Memory40.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 05:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 267
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 971
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,398
86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 175
Parallax 168
150% 176 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 137
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 1007 956 600 503 506 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 2,030
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 778
365% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 62.9
212% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 738
554% 744 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 226%
Great: 278%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 186 191 174 175 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 148
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 184
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CVF 86D3 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CVF 48GB
2666, 2933, 2666, 2933 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 25.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90NC00JJUS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 90NC00JJUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback