Asrock X299 Taichi XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Taichi XE  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$349
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 972
85% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,618
100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 84.1
50% 70 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 47.6
48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
72GB free
Firmware: SBFA13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 138 139 139 138 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 388
Write 123
Mixed 306
SusWrite 158
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 31.2
125% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 182
165% 248 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 102%
ALCYON 512GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 450 435 270 257 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 448
Mixed 439
SusWrite 357
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 41.8
151% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 288
218% 291 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 312%
Hs-ssd-e100n 1024G 1TB
892GB free
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 428 426 429 426 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 448
Mixed 388
SusWrite 432
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 31.9
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 195
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 116 115 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 82.8
Write 114
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 116
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 67%
Fujitsu MHY2060BH 60GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0093000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 45.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 47.8
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
734GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 101
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 90.7
110% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 13.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Taichi XE Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,717
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback