Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 68 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 83.6 45% 70 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 177 19% 153 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 6.3 18 16 21 2.6 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31% Below average	Read 169 Write 71.3 Mixed 272 SusWrite 22.9 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 13.6 58% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 33.8 48% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 256GB free Firmware: AX0R2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 107 106 108 104 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52% Above average	Read 76.4 Write 76.9 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 105 52% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1600S3V64L11/8G Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	1x

SSD
TS128GSSD230S 128GBTranscendBench 83%, 2,263 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
SA400S3 480GBKingstonBench 75%, 73 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GBHynixBench 44%, 358 samples	4x
AD73I1C1674EV 2x4GBAdataBench 43%, 1,403 samples	1x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 44%, 3,343 samples	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $52