Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2970M 27 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 47.8 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 73.7 32% 51.9 Pts	4-Core 92.9 8-Core 98 13% 95.4 Pts	64-Core 91 6% 91 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 10E9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 3 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Flash Voyager 2GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.3 Write 6 Mixed 4.5 12% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.7 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	60x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	27x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	13x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	4x
SU720 500GBAdataBench 81%, 3,550 samples	4x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	3x

RAM
M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 29%, 1,618 samples	11x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GBUnknownBench 54%, 209 samples	9x
MSI16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 63 samples	5x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39