Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 243
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 252 210 215 217 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,029
Write 844
Mixed 912
SusWrite 240
169% 756 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 51.2
184% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 556
427% 582 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 139%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston KMKYF9-MIH 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 35%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback