TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 18:53
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 143
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 159
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 46.7%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.9
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.72%
 Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 202 191 179 182 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,079
Write 890
Mixed 809
SusWrite 208
166% 746 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 25.3
130% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 481
366% 498 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston KMKYF9-MIH 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 55.5%
 Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples8x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples6x
GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples14x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples9x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GBNvmeBench 130%, 1,492 samples3x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel  $58Bench 156%, 162,275 samples1x
RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples5x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples4x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston KMKYF9-MIH 12GBMicronBench 51%, 2 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback