Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9820 18 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 25.4 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 70.6 24% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 209 22% 174 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 350 17 User benchmarks, average bench 11% MSI(1462 7C28) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.12000.6056 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 16.2 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 23.2 13% 19.6 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 17.8 13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA950-2280 256GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 168 99 67 35 36 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.2% Poor	Read 185 Write 156 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 82.6 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 1 32% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 29.6 DQ Mixed 0.9 7% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.6 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 283 14% 283 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	482x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	462x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16