MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B50
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 19:41
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 871
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 262
Parallax 294
228% 279 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 238
Splatting 179
195% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 81 78 71 22 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 584
Write 62.8
Mixed 136
SusWrite 66.1
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 30.8
105% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 87.9
86% 141 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 295%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
111GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,810
Write 1,917
Mixed 1,686
404% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 54.3
178% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,075
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 932
692% 921 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
26GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.1 4.9 4.3 4.5 4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 56.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 5.3
41% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 69%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
78GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 32 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 23.9
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 34.1
33% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 43%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
143GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 39
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 4.2
46% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
2TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 84 82 83 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 88.4
Mixed 130
SusWrite 81.2
135% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.5
313% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50) Builds (Compare 2,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback