Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 133 59% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 392 40% 322 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 9470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33% Below average	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 56.8 30% 50.6 fps	MRender 58.8 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 42.4 39% 48.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 261 Write 225 Mixed 233 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 23.5 92% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 44.4 70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 166%
ST332061 3AS 320GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 69GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 52.7 Write 26.8 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 27.9 40% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 46% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-PB MXIC 25L8005 41GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16