Medion Scout E10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Scout E10  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNK
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220222
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 10:58
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 345
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 997
105% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 867D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1181
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.8% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 81.5
Parallax 77.4
69% 81 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 61.2
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-B47R 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1167 1139 1159 1188 1439 1378 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 341
Write 694
Mixed 295
SusWrite 1,245
147% 644 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 79.5
310% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1075
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1,010
756% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 229%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 37.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 27.1
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Scout E10 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Medion Scout E10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback