HP p6626at

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6626at  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 09:48
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 139
57% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 246
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2130) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 169 191 201 208 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 242
Write 232
Mixed 219
SusWrite 194
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 30.9
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 128
106% 151 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 126%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 132 132 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 116
Write 130
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 130
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
930GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 186 183 186 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 172
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 181
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CD04CD04 F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ0 AD80AD80 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ0 AD80AD80 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6626at Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6626at

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback