Lenovo 20LNS0Q400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20LNS0Q400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LNS0Q400
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 15:17
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 34.3
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 92.8
31% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 151
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.4
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 155 178 143 254 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 405
Write 290
Mixed 335
SusWrite 192
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 24.3
71% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 135
101% 135 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20LNS0Q400 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20LNS0Q400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback