Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 25.2 1-Core 39 2-Core 78.3 26% 47.5 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 138 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.5% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.5% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0107ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 224 219 276 260 295 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 412 Write 288 Mixed 332 SusWrite 257 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 23.1 80% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 129 101% 138 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 285 14% 285 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	2x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmt256gBench 104%, 1,245 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 3,234 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16