Lenovo 82UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82UF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 253
78% 150 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 578
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
PNY(196E 138F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.37
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 133
Parallax 95.6
83% 110 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 85.4
85% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
708GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 1255 899 609 434 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 1,006
Mixed 1,129
SusWrite 788
225% 999 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 52.6
167% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 407
296% 393 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 161%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 54.6
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 27.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 143%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82UF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback