Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 169 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 309 39% 298 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PwrHis(1787 7250) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 13.5 7% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 10.2 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03200001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 377 201 65 66 66 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 437 Write 400 Mixed 333 SusWrite 191 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 35.2 120% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 123 101% 143 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
Quadro 410NvidiaBench 3%, 934 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
Q300 240GBToshiba $85Bench 75%, 5,005 samples	1x

RAM
RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 52%, 69 samples	2x
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GBCorsairBench 27%, 1,374 samples	1x
CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,052 samples	1x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $208