Lenovo 81BF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81BF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 10:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 13.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 78.7
33% 60 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 178
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39B5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.8
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.1
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G3BTND-N210A 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 232 317 245 323 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 300
Write 283
Mixed 217
SusWrite 281
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 11.9
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 138
109% 152 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
775GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 316 372 328 330 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 336
Write 296
Mixed 304
SusWrite 333
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 16.6
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 236
186% 260 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FP 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 371
11% 371 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81BF Builds (Compare 877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback