GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 04:40
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 249
74% 140 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 382
44% 341 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 20.9
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 18.2
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 512GB 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08108W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 402 394 388 384 380 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 420
Mixed 396
SusWrite 394
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 35.9
128% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 285
207% 267 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 33.2
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 15.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback