Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 799
71% 600 Pts
64-Core 2,375
147% 2,375 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 116
Parallax 124
103% 122 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.4
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 356 372 356 389 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 411
Write 390
Mixed 352
SusWrite 355
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 28.3
91% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 196
156% 224 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 123%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
367GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 382 394 372 400 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 404
Mixed 379
SusWrite 390
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 27.5
90% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 176
142% 210 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 118%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 202 189 187 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 191
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 193
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 250 229 238 255 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 143 134 139 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 157
Mixed 103
SusWrite 138
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
401GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 104 98 103 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 96.6
Write 104
Mixed 63
SusWrite 101
124% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR128GX4M8X3600C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 69.8
MC Mixed 44.3
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 129%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback