Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 823
73% 618 Pts
64-Core 2,434
151% 2,434 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 119
Parallax 123
104% 123 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.9
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
599GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 380 390 354 373 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 378
Mixed 360
SusWrite 375
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 27.8
93% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 190
155% 229 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 123%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
367GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 390 397 388 397 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 472
Write 383
Mixed 361
SusWrite 395
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 24.1
81% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 181
148% 218 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 118%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 191 202 190 188 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 192
Mixed 71
SusWrite 195
118% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 238 250 239 235 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 142 146 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 147
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 146
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
325GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 76 78 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 85.6
Write 85.7
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 78.5
105% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR128GX4M8X3600C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 35.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback