Performance Results


Gaming 234% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 212% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	262% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 770 76% 623 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$1,100 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Gigabyte(1458 40BD) ≥ 4GB; GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 4080 16GB MASTER CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	262% Outstanding	Lighting 364 Reflection 420 Parallax 497 297% 427 fps	MRender 552 Gravity 376 Splatting 268 311% 399 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1513 1565 1565 1545 1461 1402 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 2,036 Write 1,715 Mixed 816 SusWrite 1,508 340% 1,519 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 50 164% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 797 DQ Write 585 DQ Mixed 729 534% 704 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 175 171 170 169 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 474 Mixed 386 SusWrite 202 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 48.7 161% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 505GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2083 2044 1494 1447 1458 1466 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,337 Write 2,136 Mixed 1,742 SusWrite 1,665 442% 1,970 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 64.9 205% 68.2 MB/s	DQ Read 884 DQ Write 586 DQ Mixed 822 590% 764 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 6,151 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 30.3 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 44.9 SC Mixed 30.4 93% 32.6 GB/s	Latency 57.9 69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 143%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	93x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	92x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $696

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16