Asus Strix GL703GS_S7BS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Strix GL703GS_S7BS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703GS
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210816
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 08:57
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 581
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 63.7
32% 59.8 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 67
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,505
Write 348
Mixed 313
155% 722 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 44
155% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 594
438% 588 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Strix GL703GS_S7BS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL703GS_S7BS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback