HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805B
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 80.3
35% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 140
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 805B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 10.3
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ060GCSU 60GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUGA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 177 212 124 160 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 366
Write 313
Mixed 312
SusWrite 168
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 14.7
55% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 58.5
65% 113 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback