Lenovo 20ENCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ENCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ENCTO1WW
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 03:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 83
2-Core 156
56% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 384
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 5.9
5% 9.37 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV75M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 297 298 298 297 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 852
Write 305
Mixed 305
SusWrite 297
97% 440 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 27.2
101% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 391
305% 429 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ENCTO1WW Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20ENCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback