Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 108 54% 84 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 278 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 21.8 16% 22.1 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 16.2 16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056R6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 103 90 101 105 93 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.3% Average	Read 231 Write 217 Mixed 193 SusWrite 115 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 19.6 63% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 143 119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 233GB free Firmware: MS1OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 137 139 135 136 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 136 Write 123 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 134 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 103%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 45GB free Firmware: 4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 88 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 82.2 Write 72 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 87.7 60% 80 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-YH9 46GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 16.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	254x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16