Acer Extensa 2540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 2540  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA40_SL
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 96
43% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 123
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 408
Write 349
Mixed 165
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 8.9
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 32
43% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 287
Write 315
Mixed 295
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 19.1
64% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 124
98% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2540 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback