Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '22 at 15:38
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 413 51% 388 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341A) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.Q4 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.9% Average	Lighting 49.2 Reflection 90.1 Parallax 68.8 40% 69.4 fps	MRender 58.8 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 43.8 42% 53 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 74 84 49 102 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 371 Write 150 Mixed 155 SusWrite 85.9 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 7.7 62% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 74.2 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 20.2 22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 85%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 170GB free Firmware: FH100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 85 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 79.9 Write 84.7 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 85.9 56% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown W641GU42J9266NB 1x8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.7 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,319x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,170x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	137x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	311x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	268x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	182x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $53Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	136x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	128x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	93x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	82x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369