Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 15:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 413
51% 388 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.9% Average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 68.8
40% 69.4 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 43.8
42% 53 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 74 84 49 102 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 371
Write 150
Mixed 155
SusWrite 85.9
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 7.7
62% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 20.2
22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
170GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 79.9
Write 84.7
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 85.9
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU42J9266NB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback