Asrock AB350 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 441
60% 444 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 19.4
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 15
Splatting 12.3
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 434 435 441 441 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 439
Mixed 431
SusWrite 431
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 45.8
150% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 276
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU42J9266NB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback